Findings and Recommendations
The Final Report puts forward a set of recommendations for the CA ANZ Board and NZICA Regulatory Board to consider.
In making its recommendations, the Committee sought to consider and balance the principles of natural justice; the rights of individual Members, including with respect to privacy and due process; the public interests of transparency and accountability; and the broader interests of the accountancy profession and other stakeholders.
The Committee also considered the broader regulatory and co-regulatory context, including the role that CA ANZ and NZICA play in upholding the professional and ethical standards of the profession.
The Committee identified a number of opportunities to enhance the Conduct and Disciplinary Framework, which was reflected in their recommendations. Some of the key recommendations include:
- Building on the existing rules to enable CA ANZ and NZICA to more effectively deal with events involving firms. This includes simplifying notification procedures to make it clearer there is an onus to report these events and issues, while increasing the maximum fines that can be imposed by:
- The PCC from $25,000 to $100,000 under a Consent Agreement.
- The Disciplinary Tribunal from $50,000 to $250,000.
This improves the handling process and accountability for Firm Events when they happen in the future. - Changing the current situation where CA ANZ cannot undertake an investigation into the conduct of former Australian Members. This will allow the disciplinary bodies to investigate regardless of membership status. For example, this would close a loophole that allows Members to avoid disciplinary action by terminating their membership.
- Introducing voluntary firm membership in New Zealand which aligns with the Australian approach.
- Strengthening the powers of the disciplinary bodies to engage a panel of experts in appropriate cases.
- Introducing a suite of administrative and case management enhancements to reduce the complexity of disciplinary proceedings.
This includes the introduction of a conciliation process, as seen in other regulatory bodies. This means a complaint may be referred to conciliation, where complainants and CA ANZ Members can engage in a facilitated alternative dispute resolution process.
It will also include streamlining and further alignment of the rules between Australia and New Zealand as much as possible. - Creating more extensive guidance materials for all Members about the independent disciplinary process, their personal self-disclosure obligations and making ethical obligations clear.
This builds on work already underway to streamline and simplify guidance materials for CA ANZ Members. - Consolidating Disciplinary Decisions into a single online public register which displays all disciplinary decisions made at all levels (PCC, DT, AT). In addition to the CA ANZ Annual Report, the register will include statistics and data about complaints dismissed and grounds for dismissal. This will increase transparency and accountability.
In conducting its Review, the Committee found that the Disciplinary Framework:
- Meets or exceeds the standards set by the International Federation of Accountants
- Is consistent with mandatory components of the Professional Standards Council Model Rules.
- Meets or exceeds international and peer benchmarks.
- Responds appropriately and proportionately to proven academic misconduct by Provisional Members, in relation to assessments and examinations undertaken for the conferral of the CA Graduate Diploma.
- Confers powers to the disciplinary bodies to consider certain matters pertaining to Firm Events.
List of consolidated recommendations
- 1. Harmonisation and Modernisation of Liability Rules
- 2. Operationalise the existing obligations of Members as partners and principals of Practice Entities (Firms)
- 3. Guidance to clarify Members’ general reporting obligations
- 4. Strengthened interim suspension powers
- 5. Enhanced administrative and case management procedures
- 6. Fairer and clearer publication and confidentiality requirements, that preserve the independence of the disciplinary bodies